Personal injury appeals are among the most common civil appeals in New York. When a negligence case reaches a jury verdict or is decided on a dispositive motion, the losing side frequently seeks review in the Appellate Division. These cases arise from car and motor-vehicle accidents, slip-and-fall and trip-and-fall incidents, premises liability claims, construction accidents, and medical malpractice. An appeal is not a new trial — the appellate court reviews the existing trial record and the parties’ written arguments to decide whether legal or factual errors affected the result. To understand the procedure generally, see our overview of the appeals process in New York.
The Law Offices of Albert Goodwin, PLLC, represents both sides of personal injury appeals. We act for injured plaintiffs — whether as appellants challenging a defense verdict or an inadequate award, or as respondents protecting a favorable judgment — and we act for defendants seeking to overturn or reduce a plaintiff’s verdict. Personal injury appeals are a subset of the broader civil appeals the firm handles, and the same strict deadlines and specialized procedural rules apply.
A personal injury case can reach the Appellate Division after a jury verdict or after a judge’s dispositive ruling that ends some or all of the case. A defendant may appeal a plaintiff’s verdict, and a plaintiff may appeal a defense verdict or a damages award that the plaintiff believes is inadequate. The most common issues raised in personal injury appeals include:
The standard of review describes how much deference the appellate court gives to what happened below, and it frequently determines the outcome. Framing each issue under the correct standard is central to appellate strategy. The standards that matter most in personal injury appeals are:
An order granting or denying summary judgment presents a question of law and is reviewed de novo. The appellate court examines the motion record afresh, without deference to the trial judge, and decides for itself whether a triable issue of fact exists. This is significant in motor-vehicle cases litigating the serious-injury threshold and in liability disputes where one side contends the facts are not genuinely contested. Our page on standards of review explains how de novo and deferential review differ.
A jury verdict challenged as against the weight of the evidence faces a high bar. The appellate court does not substitute its own view of the facts for the jury’s; it will disturb the verdict only where the evidence so preponderated in favor of the losing party that the jury could not have reached its conclusion on any fair interpretation of the evidence. When a verdict is set aside on this ground, the usual remedy is a new trial rather than judgment for the appealing party.
The size of a damages award is reviewed under a distinct standard. Under CPLR 5501(c), the Appellate Division determines whether an award “deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation.” This is the standard the court applies when it considers additur (increasing an inadequate award) or remittitur (reducing an excessive one). A plaintiff who believes a verdict undercompensated serious injuries, and a defendant who contends an award is excessive, both invoke this standard on appeal.
An appeal is started by filing and serving a notice of appeal. In most civil cases, including personal injury matters, the notice must be filed within 30 days after service of the judgment or order with written notice of its entry. This 30-day deadline is jurisdictional, which means the court has no power to extend it once it has passed — even a single day late will ordinarily defeat the appeal. Because the clock typically begins when the notice of entry is served, anyone considering an appeal should consult an appellate attorney promptly so the right to appeal is preserved.
Personal injury cases are tried in the Supreme Court, and appeals from those judgments go to the Appellate Division, organized geographically into departments:
Appellate practice statewide is governed by a uniform set of rules at 22 NYCRR Part 1250, which dictate how the record on appeal is assembled, how briefs are formatted, and the deadlines that apply at each stage. A complete and accurate record is essential, because the appellate court will not consider evidence or arguments that were not part of the trial court record.
Filing a notice of appeal does not automatically stop the judgment from being enforced. Without a stay, a prevailing plaintiff can begin collecting on a money judgment while the defendant’s appeal is pending, and a plaintiff whose case was dismissed gains nothing while seeking reversal. Under CPLR 5519, an appellant may obtain a stay, and a defendant can often stay enforcement of a money judgment by posting an undertaking. Securing the appropriate stay is frequently an urgent priority in personal injury appeals — our page on a stay pending appeal explains the options.
Personal injury appeals take time and are not a second chance to retry the facts. From the notice of appeal to a decision, the process often runs 12 to 24 months, depending on the department, the size of the record, and the court’s calendar. Most judgments are affirmed, and reversal rates are generally low, so success depends on identifying genuine legal errors and presenting them persuasively under the governing standard of review. We give an honest assessment of the strength of an appeal at the outset so you can make an informed decision about whether to pursue or defend it.
Because the deadline to file a notice of appeal is strict and jurisdictional — generally just 30 days from service of notice of entry — it is important to act without delay. The Law Offices of Albert Goodwin, PLLC, located in Midtown Manhattan, represents injured plaintiffs and defendants in personal injury appeals throughout New York. To discuss your case, call us at 212-233-1233, email email@appealappeal.com, or visit our contact page.